Interactive case stories for trial lawyers

The whole record, gathered into one beam.

Scrollbrief builds interactive demand packages, mediation presentations, trial graphics and sentencing mitigation pieces. Each one is a private scrolling page where the picture moves with the argument and every factual line opens the record behind it.

Station Scrollbrief Character Fl (7) W Range adjuster to jury Keeper the attorney on the matter

Scroll. This page is the pitch and the proof.

I · The lamp

  1. The problem

    A record shines in every direction.

    A serious case arrives as charts, ledgers, a police report, depositions, photographs and a policy. Each document is a ray. A reader a mile off sees a glow and no shape.

  2. The demand letter carries it. Software now writes the letter.

    Customers of one case-management platform draft more than 100,000 demand letters a month with its AI tools. Sacra on Filevine A letter that looks like every other letter is read like every other letter.

  3. Software reads it, too.

    On the carrier side, a review tool condenses a demand package in minutes. Verisk The adjuster can meet your client as a summary of a summary.

  4. A settlement video answers with feeling.

    A settlement documentary or day-in-the-life video makes the harm felt, and one runs $5,000 to $15,000. The Indiana Lawyer The viewer still cannot skim it, search it or check one claim against the record. The record needs a lens.

II · The lens

1
  1. What a scrollbrief is

    A lens, cut into seven rings.

    A lighthouse lens keeps the slope of the glass and drops the bulk. A scrollbrief does the same to a case file: it keeps the facts that turn a reader toward the answer and sets the rest one tap behind them.

  2. Seven rings, seven beats.

    The person. What happened. Why it happened. What they knew. The harm. The numbers. The ask. Take the slider and cut the lens yourself.

  3. Every line opens its source.

    Each factual sentence carries a chip that opens the page of the record it rests on: the chart, the transcript line, the bill. The other side’s best facts are on the page too, so nothing waits to be found.

  4. One beam the reader can follow.

    It arrives as a private link that works on a phone, with a PDF twin for the claim file, the mediator or the court. Next: a working excerpt, built from a public case.

III · The beam · a working excerpt

Holding temperature, degrees Fahrenheit

Source: American Museum of Tort Law.

Time to a third-degree burn

McDonald’s, 180–190°about 3 s
Other restaurants, about 160°about 20 s

Bar length is time. Source: American Museum of Tort Law.

One dot per reported burn

700+burn reports, 1982 to 1992
1 in 24 millioncups, the company’s framing

From verdict to settlement

Jury verdict$2,860,000
After the judge’s cut$640,000
Settlementconfidential
Bars are drawn to one scale. The settlement amount is sealed, so its box has no scale.
  1. Step 01 · Liebeck v. McDonald’s, 1994

    The hot-coffee case, in four steps.

    Read it the way an adjuster would: skim, stop where you doubt, open the source. Start with the heat. McDonald’s required its coffee held at 180 to 190 degrees. Other restaurants served near 160, and home brewers run 135 to 150. American Museum of Tort Law

  2. Step 02

    Then the clock.

    At 160 degrees a third-degree burn takes about 20 seconds. At McDonald’s holding temperature it takes about three. Run both clocks and wait them out. American Museum of Tort Law

  3. Step 03

    Then what the company knew.

    More than 700 people reported burns between 1982 and 1992. Carlson Law Firm McDonald’s answered that this came to one complaint per 24 million cups. Mental Floss The page shows both and lets the reader weigh them.

  4. Step 04

    Then the money.

    The jury’s award came to $2.86 million: $160,000 in compensatory damages after a 20 percent fault reduction, plus $2.7 million in punitive damages. The judge cut the punitive award to $480,000, and the parties settled for a confidential amount. American Museum of Tort Law

IV · One fact, four ways

1 of 4 · Demand letterillustration

Re: Claim of S. LiebeckPage 14 of 62

…liability is further established by the temperature at which the product was held and served. Defendant required that its coffee be held at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit, at which temperature a third-degree burn occurs in approximately three seconds, whereas at 160 degrees the same injury requires approximately twenty.31 Other establishments in the area served coffee at substantially lower temperatures…

31 See Exhibit 22.

The highlight is ours. On the real page nothing marks the sentence, and the proof sits in another file. Page and exhibit numbers are invented for the illustration.

2 of 4 · Settlement videoillustration

The line is spoken once, in the middle of the film, and passes. There is no footnote to open. The runtime is invented for the illustration.

3 of 4 · Slide deckillustration

Three bullets. The proof was the person who presented them.

4 of 4 · Scrollbrief

McDonald’s, 180–190°about 3 s
Other restaurants, about 160°about 20 s
Open the source

Same fact. The reader times it and checks it without leaving the page.

What each form lets the reader do

The reader canLetterVideoSlidesScroll
Set their own pace yesnopartlyyes
Skim to the number partlynoyesyes
Check the source in one tap partlynonoyes
See it move noyespartlyyes
Work it by hand nononoyes
Read it without a presenter yesyesnoyes
File it as paper yesnoyesyes
Hear a voice, see a face noyesnopartly
Have it drafted in an afternoon yesnoyesno
  1. The comparison

    One fact, four ways.

    You just read the clock step. Here is that same fact in the three forms a firm usually sends, then in the form you just used. First, the demand letter: complete, familiar, and the reader builds the picture alone.

  2. As a settlement video.

    Film makes harm felt, and a face and a voice do work no page can. The viewer sits through the runtime to reach this one line, hears it once, and has no way to check it.

  3. As a slide.

    Clear when counsel presents it across the table. Read alone a week later by a claims supervisor, three bullets carry no proof.

  4. As a scrollbrief.

    The reader runs the clocks, waits out the twenty seconds and opens the source. Nobody told them the coffee was too hot. They timed it themselves.

  5. The whole card.

    A scrollbrief keeps the letter’s completeness, the film’s motion and the slide’s speed, and adds two things none of them have: the reader’s own hands and the source one tap away. It takes days where a letter takes an afternoon, and your letter still goes out with it.

    The full comparison

V · Why it holds

Three findings the form is built on

A presentation works when the reader understands it, believes it and can repeat it to the person who signs the check. Learning research has measured what helps with the first of those.

Pace

Readers learn more when they set the pace.

A meta-analysis of segmenting studies found that people learn better from material presented in learner-paced segments than from one continuous run. Educational Psychology Review

A scrollbrief is segments the reader advances. A film is one continuous run.

Place

Words belong beside their picture.

Students learn better when corresponding words and pictures sit near each other on the screen. Mayer, Multimedia Learning

Each step sits on the visual it describes. A letter sends the reader to Exhibit 22.

Pairing

Words with pictures beat words alone.

People learn more deeply from words and graphics together than from words alone. Mayer, Research-Based Principles

A demand letter is words alone. A scrollbrief pairs every argument with its picture.

These findings come from learning research, most of it with students. Adjusters, mediators and judges have yet to be studied this way, so take the research as the reason for the design and judge the result on the excerpt above.

VI · Four lights

Four pieces, one method

Firms search for this work under a dozen names. These are the four things Scrollbrief builds.

Injury and wrongful death

Interactive demand packages

Liability, medical chronology, damages and the ask on one page for the adjuster, before suit.

Also called a settlement demand package, a settlement brochure, or the exhibits to a policy-limits demand.

$7,500 to $15,000, about 10 business days.

Cases in suit

Mediation presentations and trial graphics

The brief the mediator reads before the session, plus visuals for opening and closing.

Also called a mediation brief, litigation graphics, demonstrative exhibits, or illustrative aids.

From $20,000, three to four weeks.

Section 1983 and public interest

Civil-rights case stories

What officials did, what the rules allowed, and how others in the same position were treated.

Used for police misconduct claims, retaliation cases and public-interest campaigns.

Priced as a demand piece or by scope.

Criminal defense

Sentencing mitigation pieces

For one reader, the judge: who the defendant is, what changed, and the plan.

An alternative or companion to a sentencing mitigation video, made to travel with the sentencing memorandum.

$5,000 to $15,000, two to three weeks.

VII · By case type

The same seven beats, set to your file

Pick a case type to see what the page carries. These describe the form and the records each kind of case usually has.

Trucking and commercial vehicle

What happened
Hours-of-service logs, dispatch messages and engine data on one clock, so the reader sees the hours before the crash beside the crash.
What they knew
The carrier’s own file: prior violations, inspection reports, hiring and training records.
The harm
Medical chronology, life-care plan and wage loss, each figure opening its page.
Signature visual
A route map that plays the trip against the driver’s log.

Auto, motorcycle and pedestrian

What happened
Police report, scene photographs, vehicle data and witness statements in one sequence.
What they knew
Phone records, citations and prior claims, where the record has them.
The harm
Treatment from the first visit forward, with bills and liens totaled and sourced.
Signature visual
An intersection the reader can step through second by second.

Premises liability

What happened
Inspection logs, work orders and surveillance stills placed on the day of the injury.
What they knew
Prior incident reports and complaints, shown as a count the reader can open one by one.
The harm
Surgery, recovery and lasting limits, tied to the records that show them.
Signature visual
A floor plan with the hazard, the cameras and the path walked.

Product liability

What happened
Design history, testing, complaints, and the recall or the absence of one.
What they knew
What the maker knew and when. The hot-coffee excerpt on the home page is this beat.
The harm
The injury mechanism and its cost, with the expert report a tap away.
Signature visual
The mechanism, drawn so a reader can work it by hand.

Medical malpractice

What happened
The chart on a clock: orders, vitals, notes, and the hours between them.
What they knew
The standard of care as your expert states it, beside what the chart shows was done.
The harm
Outcome, prognosis and future care, each sourced. Your medical illustrator’s plates sit inside the piece.
Signature visual
A timeline where each missed interval is a gap the reader can see.

Wrongful death

What happened
The event and the decisions before it, in the defendant’s own documents.
What they knew
Warnings given, rules in place, and earlier incidents.
The harm
A life told through its records and its people: work, family, the plans on the calendar.
Signature visual
A day-in-the-life sequence built from photographs and messages, with any video you have placed inside.

Nursing home and elder care

What happened
Care plans, staffing sheets and charting set against the resident’s decline.
What they knew
Survey citations, prior complaints and corporate staffing targets.
The harm
Wounds, falls, weight loss and hospital stays, each dated and sourced.
Signature visual
Staffing against census, shift by shift.

Civil rights and police misconduct

What happened
Body-camera stills, dispatch audio and reports on one clock.
What they knew
Policy, training records, and how others were treated: the comparison evidence.
The harm
Jail time, injury and what followed, in the client’s records.
Signature visual
Every comparable case as a tile, with the client’s standing apart.

Criminal sentencing

What happened
A life line that turns at the offense, with documented steps marked after it.
What they knew
What changed: treatment, work and restitution, each with a record.
The harm
Who depends on the defendant and what a sentence does to them, shown plainly.
Signature visual
A record wall: certificates, pay stubs and letters the judge can open one by one.

All case types on one page

VIII · The keeper’s rules

The attorney keeps the light

Scrollbrief is the firm’s vendor. Counsel sets the theme and the ask, approves the outline, and signs off on a cite table listing every claim against its source before anything is sent.

The full process, with the opinions and rules behind it

  • Every claim cites the record. The other side’s best facts appear on the page too.
  • No hidden tracking. Nothing covert rides on a link sent to an opposing party. Arizona EO-20-0008
  • Private by default. An unindexed link, no third-party scripts, files deleted at takedown.
  • AI tools by written approval only. Each firm decides which tools may touch its files. ABA Formal Op. 512
  • Flat fees. Never a percentage of the recovery. WSBA Op. 2126
  • Built for the courtroom rules. Trial visuals are prepared as illustrative aids, with Federal Rule of Evidence 107 in mind. Trial Magazine

IX · Fees and time

Flat fees, stated up front

PieceFlat feeFrom file to link
Interactive demand package$7,500 to $15,000about 10 business days
Mediation presentation and trial graphicsfrom $20,000three to four weeks
Sentencing mitigation piece$5,000 to $15,000two to three weeks

For scale, published figures put a settlement video at $5,000 to $15,000. The Indiana Lawyer A settlement documentary runs $20,000 and up. Plaintiff Magazine A sentencing mitigation video runs $5,000 to $25,000. Criminal Legal News Scrollbrief fees are billed to the firm, half up front.

Why a scrolling page instead of a video or a slide deck?

Because the reader can pace it, check it and work it by hand. A video has a fixed runtime and no footnotes. A slide deck needs its presenter. A scrollbrief lets an adjuster, mediator or judge skim to the number, open the record behind any line, and run a timeline or a clock themselves. Learning research finds people learn better from learner-paced segments, and from words set beside their pictures.

Who controls the content?

The attorney does. Scrollbrief works as the firm’s vendor. The attorney sets the theme and the ask, approves the outline, reviews a cite table listing every claim and its source, and signs off before anything is sent.

How do you handle confidential records?

Scrollbrief signs confidentiality terms with each firm and follows any protective order in the case. Pieces are hosted on a private link that search engines cannot index, with no third-party scripts. On the agreed takedown date the link closes and working files are deleted.

All questions and answers

X · The maker

Built by a scrolly maker

Scrollbrief comes out of Michael Wilhelm’s scrollies: 20 published interactive essays, each readable without scripts, each with a plain-text twin, each with its sources listed. The mark on this page is a lighthouse lens cut into seven rings with the formula from one of them.

thickness = profile(h) mod t   rings = 7

A mechanism, explained

How to Throw a Flame Twenty Miles

How a ringed lighthouse lens gathers lamp light into a beam a ship can see from twenty miles out, in five parts with sliders the reader works by hand.

Evidence, on the record

Nobody Sees the Same Sea

Five ways water, light and animal eyes change what seeing means, closing with a species list and an “On the record” section of sources.

Built for any reader

The Snowflake Machine

A touch-first symmetry toy: draw one line and mirrors turn it into a butterfly, a starfish or a snowflake.

More of the work, and the sample case stories

The ask

Bring one case.

Pick a matter with a strong record and a story that is hard to see in the stack. One call is enough to tell whether the form fits, and what the first screen would be.

The record, gathered into one beam.